Bartholomew Science
Bartholomew Science
  • Видео 130
  • Просмотров 193 438

Видео

P7 - Gas Laws (Molecular Model and Kinetic Theory)
Просмотров 1 тыс.8 лет назад
P7 - Gas Laws (Molecular Model and Kinetic Theory)
P7 - Gas Law Calculations and Graphs
Просмотров 1,6 тыс.8 лет назад
P7 - Gas Law Calculations and Graphs
P4 - Work and Energy Calculations
Просмотров 4998 лет назад
P4 - Work and Energy Calculations
P6 - Half Life
Просмотров 3098 лет назад
P6 - Half Life
P4 - Work and Energy, GPE and KE (no calculations)
Просмотров 7068 лет назад
P4 - Work and Energy, GPE and KE (no calculations)
P4 - Resultant Force (and momentum) Calculations
Просмотров 2 тыс.8 лет назад
Link to the non-calculation resultant force video ruclips.net/video/a1NLZ5q3pH4/видео.html Link to the triangle method video ruclips.net/video/rjjmHoVktuc/видео.html
P4 - Resultant Force (no complex calculations)
Просмотров 8888 лет назад
P4 - Resultant Force (no complex calculations)
Peer Review and Development of Scientific Ideas
Просмотров 828 лет назад
Peer Review and Development of Scientific Ideas
P3 - Power station block diagrams and advantages/disadvantages
Просмотров 2088 лет назад
P3 - Power station block diagrams and advantages/disadvantages
C4- Writing ionic formulae
Просмотров 988 лет назад
Description
C4 - Drawing ions
Просмотров 1,1 тыс.8 лет назад
Description
C4 - Atomic Structure
Просмотров 2628 лет назад
Description
P2 - Greenhouse Effect & Global Warming
Просмотров 2768 лет назад
P2 - Greenhouse Effect & Global Warming
P2 - Ionising and Non-ionising absorption
Просмотров 5898 лет назад
P2 - Ionising and Non-ionising absorption
P2 - Electromagnetic Spectrum
Просмотров 2408 лет назад
P2 - Electromagnetic Spectrum
P3 - Contamination and Irradiation
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.8 лет назад
P3 - Contamination and Irradiation
P2 - Photon Model and Intensity
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.8 лет назад
P2 - Photon Model and Intensity
Risk
Просмотров 1008 лет назад
Risk
Writing balanced chemical equations
Просмотров 1008 лет назад
Writing balanced chemical equations
P3 Video - Reducing Energy Consumption
Просмотров 3258 лет назад
P3 Video - Reducing Energy Consumption
P1 Video - Wave Properties and Calculations
Просмотров 4658 лет назад
P1 Video - Wave Properties and Calculations
Chemistry and Double Investigation - Copper Electrolysis 2016
Просмотров 3118 лет назад
Chemistry and Double Investigation - Copper Electrolysis 2016
P7 - Retrograde Motion
Просмотров 2,6 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Retrograde Motion
P7 - Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram and Stellar Evolution
Просмотров 30 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram and Stellar Evolution
P7 - Parallax
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Parallax
P7 - Cepheid Variables, Luminosity and Observed Intensity
Просмотров 2,7 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Cepheid Variables, Luminosity and Observed Intensity
P7 - Diffraction and Aperture Size
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Diffraction and Aperture Size
P7 - Telescopes and the need for mirrors
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Telescopes and the need for mirrors
P7 - Solar, Sidereal & Lunar day
Просмотров 22 тыс.9 лет назад
P7 - Solar, Sidereal & Lunar day

Комментарии

  • @vedantthakur09
    @vedantthakur09 21 день назад

    Hi don't abandoned your channel just keep uploading a video a week it will grow... May take a year or 2 but it will

  • @phdnk
    @phdnk 2 месяца назад

    Why don't heavy stars fuze iron even at the net energy loss? Why heavy stars don't overshoot the iron peak? Iron cores have enough gravitational energy to spend on iron fusion but they don't.

  • @phdnk
    @phdnk 2 месяца назад

    Why don't Ni(p,γ)Cu or Ni(α,γ)Zn processes happen in heavy stars during Si burn but before core collapse begins? Assume stellar core has grav-energy to spend.

  • @albertyeung5787
    @albertyeung5787 3 месяца назад

    excellent explantion

  • @AdnanKhan-qi3qr
    @AdnanKhan-qi3qr 3 месяца назад

    hi

  • @arjunshah7138
    @arjunshah7138 6 месяцев назад

    Excellent video!

  • @drantsplants
    @drantsplants 10 месяцев назад

    Brilliant video

  • @samba286
    @samba286 10 месяцев назад

    Thank you so much for this awesome video. The Year 11 Physics ATAR class from Southern River College in Perth WA loved the clarity in this video. Calculating velocity from displacement time graphs are in our curriculum so we greatly appreciated it!

  • @elpresidente28
    @elpresidente28 10 месяцев назад

    Well explained, thank you!

  • @eleonora7960
    @eleonora7960 Год назад

    very helpful video

  • @Holly9473
    @Holly9473 Год назад

    Yep. This video is by far the best explanation. Thank you so much!

  • @walt3223
    @walt3223 Год назад

    sidereal month is closer to 27.32 days making the lunar sidereal day closer to 360/27.32 = 13.18 degrees travel per day. A lunar month is 29.53 days, which is 2.21 days longer than the sidereal month, which means the moon travels 29.12 degrees further, making the lunar day 12.19 degrees which makes the different between the sidereal and lunar day .99 degrees.

  • @kevinevans5921
    @kevinevans5921 Год назад

    I just can’t grasp the sidereal day. So each day is about 3.5 minutes short of 24 hours. Multiply it by 365 and we get another full day? So a sidereal year is exactly one day longer????

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee Год назад

      The earth rotates on its axis AND orbits the sun at the same time. Therefore, the stars return to the same place in the sky just less than 24 hours later.

    • @kevinevans5921
      @kevinevans5921 Год назад

      @@WedgePee so does the position of the stars from earth change slightly each year?

  • @talkintoyourself6289
    @talkintoyourself6289 Год назад

    Earth is flat and stationary and sun is orbiting over it. Research flat earth

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 Год назад

    The BULK DENSITY of what is the Moon IS comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on THE EARTH/ground. The MARIA (lunar “seas") occupy ONE THIRD of the visible near side of WHAT IS THE MOON. This IS fundamentally related to the surface gravity of WHAT IS THE MOON (It IS about ONE SIXTH of that of THE EARTH.). Attention: The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. The gravity of the Sun upon what is the Moon IS about TWICE that of THE EARTH. ON BALANCE, the lunar crust on the far side of what is the Moon is about TWICE as thick in comparison with the near side. Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS E=MC2 is, in fact, dimensionally consistent. Magnificent. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

  • @frankdimeglio8216
    @frankdimeglio8216 Год назад

    The BULK DENSITY of what is the Moon IS comparable to that of (volcanic) basaltic LAVAS on THE EARTH/ground. The MARIA (lunar “seas") occupy ONE THIRD of the visible near side of WHAT IS THE MOON. This IS fundamentally related to the surface gravity of WHAT IS THE MOON (It IS about ONE SIXTH of that of THE EARTH.). Attention: The rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. The gravity of the Sun upon what is the Moon IS about TWICE that of THE EARTH. ON BALANCE, the lunar crust on the far side of what is the Moon is about TWICE as thick in comparison with the near side. Great. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). WHAT IS E=MC2 is, in fact, dimensionally consistent. Magnificent. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

  • @Alittlepillowcompanyhome
    @Alittlepillowcompanyhome Год назад

    Ah ha….finally got it!! Thanks so much!

  • @sabikunnahersumi6355
    @sabikunnahersumi6355 Год назад

    Outstanding explanation!!! Thank you very much, it was really helpful

  • @lol-nl7hk
    @lol-nl7hk Год назад

    thank

  • @santiagomoebio
    @santiagomoebio 2 года назад

    HR is a dynamic space, not a photography. This video helped me understand better the different types of stars and their different evolutions.

  • @minefacex
    @minefacex 2 года назад

    Thank you, this was a very short and understandable explanation.

  • @tychophotiou6962
    @tychophotiou6962 2 года назад

    I have noticed astrophysicists often use the term "clouds of dust and gas" but when you delve in to what is meant by dust they can never answer and always end up with "it is really just a cloud of gas". Would you agree? If not what exactly is meant by "dust"? On earth dust usually means a small particle barely visible to the human eye, which may contain a mixture of elements or compounds. But there is no such thing as Hydrogen dust!

    • @porcuspine2368
      @porcuspine2368 2 года назад

      I know you didn't ask me but my understanding is that heavy elements (those beyond iron) are only formed by supernovae. This means that the original stars in the universe were indeed formed out of clouds of hydrogen and some helium, but after this first generation the heavier elements were formed, and so newer generation stars (our sun is a 3rd generation star) are also formed with small amounts of these heavier elements, which simply didn't exist for the formation of earlier stars. This is the 'dust', along with other trace materials like maybe the remains of planets or comets. It's pretty inconsequential (probably), so that's why we tend to just ignore it.

    • @tychophotiou6962
      @tychophotiou6962 2 года назад

      @@porcuspine2368 brilliant answer, thanks for that. I never thought about the fact that the remnants of supernovae also may contribute to the matter that forms new stars. This suggest that there could possibly be some gold, silver, platinum, tungsten, etc, inside the sun! Amazing!!!

  • @ThompPL1
    @ThompPL1 2 года назад

    Great Qualitative Tutorial on Stellar Evolution ! . . . would love to see this upgraded to a *strictly* Quantitative treatment (and comprehensive with many different starting points).

  • @hannesswart4827
    @hannesswart4827 2 года назад

    A day is 24 hours not 24hour and 4 minutes. That is why the earth is not a spinning ball.

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee 2 года назад

      A solar day (the time for Earth to make one rotation on its axis) is 24 hours. The Earth also orbits the Sun, which means the stars will never be in the same place in the sky at the same time on two different days.

    • @throwawayavclubber7269
      @throwawayavclubber7269 2 года назад

      Did you watch the video?

  • @ritvikmalhotra9489
    @ritvikmalhotra9489 3 года назад

    Really great bcz I have been confused in this for real long time.... excellent explanation

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee 3 года назад

      I vaguely remember doing this (as I was taking my Physics GCSE around the time of this video). Sadly, Mr Jon Sheppard (the narrator, and my teacher) died on 29 December 2018. He was 38 years old.

  • @eliaskoff
    @eliaskoff 3 года назад

    Hi inquire about this thing if I live on the equator and the sun rise every day at 6 a.m. in the next day the sun is supposed to rise 4 minutes early meaning 5:56 a.m. Because in real the actual day for the sunrising is the same at 6 a.m in the morning not earlier before four minutes in this case we using solar day or sidereal day ?

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee 3 года назад

      Because the Earth orbits the Sun as well as rotating on its axis, the stars will never be in exactly the same place at the same time. Mr Jon Sheppard (the narrator of these videos) passed away in 2018. I know this because he was my GCSE Physics teacher.

  • @Wild1KY
    @Wild1KY 3 года назад

    Earth is a flat circle with a dome over it. What u see at night are called “LUMINARIES” this is KNOWN To all non sheeple. Now, over this pizza pie flat circle we live on is a DOME covering it. TV series “Under the dome “ Ring a bell? Now, who would look at their ceiling & use that to determine what the shape of your floor is? Sounds dumb right? Who has a tape measure to say the moon is 237k away? (Use your critical thinking skills that the School took from you) what u see at night “the stars” are a compass, a map, & a clock! Period! Another fact; water cannot bend nor curve in its natural resting place. EVER! Hence “Sea LEVEL”... Michelson Morley experiment showed ZERO motion on the Flat earth PLANE! Hence; airPLANE!!! U better start understanding that words & terms have meaning! Fun Fact; werher von Braun has (father of rocketry & a SS operation paperclip plant) has Psalms 19:1 on his gravestone. Aka the FIRMAMENT! This whole video is “theories” & Falsehoods! The only thing that NASA (Hebrew word meaning deceive) has taken to “space” is your MIND!!! There is no space! Just luminaries attached to the Firmament, dome... Fact; the Antarctic Treaty PROVES this! Signed in 1959 and NASA by SS guestopo, was formed right after this treaty. Aka, they discovered the Dome via operation High jump, operation fishbowl & operation Dominic. These are all Document FACTS! Everything I have said is FACTS!!! Period! & the “Elite” know this! They have you (sheep) looking up at the ceiling, fantasizing about stars & space. All theories, along with “gravity” by the way. It’s a theory. What it really is, buoyancy & density. If it’s lighter than air it rises & heavier it falls. Helium vs a rock. Buoyancy is the water part. If it’s heavier than water it sinks, or is lighter it floats. Rock vs a Leaf or boat. Think about it, you think “Gravity” holds all these oceans to a spinning ball, yet allows a butterfly to fly away??? Stop it! Get ur head out of the skies & start learning the TRUTH! Start with everything I said & try to disprove it. THEN, go to Mark Sargent Flat Earth clues directors cut (hard to find in censorship days) But it’s there. THEN, go to David Weiss “Flat Earth Sun & Moon Zodiac Clock App” and afternoon about a week (if u are slow) u will know, without a doubt, we do NOT live in a spinning ball. And “planets” are just wandering luminaries that are not “Tera forms”... BIT COIN for anyone who can prove a globe WITHOUT using NAS (deceive in hebrew) or the faked CGI “ISS” (Egyptian Goddess) To try & tell me it’s a Globe. Prove it’s a Globe, spinning & all that without using the same tools that I have available to me. I mean use REAL life Experiments to prove it. I can prove the flat earth plane all day. Over 200 proofs & 16 emergency landing (its a book by the way) To price nine. (I have been at this for over 12 years & I cannot price a Globe) It’s ALL cgi, Trickery, Lies in the classroom. And don’t forget NASA deep underwater Buoyancy pool that has the EXACT mock up of the ISS underwater. There is a green screen surrounding the whole pool (millions of gallons) to Make the Hoax look “somewhat” believable to the sheep. If u are really SMART & not indoctrinated, then u will KNOW This in a few hours or days. (Depends on if ur ready to let go of your precious ball) ??? Now disprove ANYTHING I have said here. Good luck :)

  • @sheknows9704
    @sheknows9704 3 года назад

    Thank you!

  • @aristhotle4882
    @aristhotle4882 3 года назад

    this is awesome thank you!

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee 2 года назад

      I relied on these videos back in 2015. Sadly, Mr Jon Sheppard passed away on 29 December 2018, aged 38.

  • @ericlind6581
    @ericlind6581 4 года назад

    Doppler effect is only ONE plausible explanation for the red shift. Red shift does not automatically mean Doppler effect.

  • @jaxsonpk1518
    @jaxsonpk1518 4 года назад

    thx

  • @hilalfatima4591
    @hilalfatima4591 4 года назад

    your speed is so fast. unable to understand the words you said

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee 2 года назад

      You can slow the video down if you need to. Also, I’m sorry to say that Jon Sheppard (the narrator of the videos on this channel) died on 29 December 2018, aged 38.

  • @cactusrox1314
    @cactusrox1314 4 года назад

    Great presentation. Thank you!

    • @WedgePee
      @WedgePee 2 года назад

      Mr Jon Sheppard sadly died on 29 December 2018.

    • @cactusrox1314
      @cactusrox1314 2 года назад

      @@WedgePee I'm sorry to hear this news. I trust that he is at peace now. My condolences to his family and loved ones.

  • @leftyopener7789
    @leftyopener7789 4 года назад

    Thanx!! really very helpful👍👍

  • @jckpn
    @jckpn 4 года назад

    Such a great teacher... rest in peace

    • @oldpolar
      @oldpolar 7 месяцев назад

      did they die irl?

  • @rj9022
    @rj9022 4 года назад

    The most concise and well illustrated explanation I have heard of the H-R diagram. Superb!!

  • @cryora
    @cryora 5 лет назад

    If photons are each a packet of carrier waves with an envelope, then how does one, via the correspondence principle, combine them to produce electromagnetic plane waves in the macroscopic scale? If the photons in a beam are spaced too far apart, there will be gaps in the longitudinal and transverse directions, so a detector won't see an oscillating signal with constant amplitude, uniform in space. The photons would have to be packed together, so their envelopes overlap; also their individual carrier waves will have to be in phase, otherwise there will be noise due to random phase "kicks" that leads to a broadening of the spectrum. If each photon is a "pulse", the spectrum of each photon is broad to begin with, unless they are long pulses.

  • @zachikhothingo1
    @zachikhothingo1 5 лет назад

    great video. thank you sir.

  • @personalpersonal8561
    @personalpersonal8561 5 лет назад

    is this for cambridge or edexcel and is this for igcses?

  • @ramsabha0
    @ramsabha0 5 лет назад

    Not audible. Even after increasing volume to maximum I couldn't hear anything

  • @michael4158
    @michael4158 5 лет назад

    Nice animation

  • @jimmyprgava
    @jimmyprgava 5 лет назад

    Very well explained !

  • @CRACKK
    @CRACKK 5 лет назад

    imagine watching ice age 3... and then not watching it after, doesent it blow your mind that there are such wonders in the world, it sure does blow mine.

  • @CRACKK
    @CRACKK 5 лет назад

    imagine watching ice age 3... and then not watching it after, doesent it blow your mind that there are such wonders in the world, it sure does blow mine.

  • @RiyadhAlDuwaisan
    @RiyadhAlDuwaisan 5 лет назад

    thnx 4 sharing

  • @bingosunnoon9341
    @bingosunnoon9341 6 лет назад

    Why are all these stellar evolution videos entry level?

    • @LardGreystoke
      @LardGreystoke 5 лет назад

      Because most advanced research isn't done on RUclips?

    • @RainbowChickenWood
      @RainbowChickenWood 5 лет назад

      Sounds like you're volunteering to create an advanced level video treatment of the HR diagram?? I'd love the link once you upload!

    • @agffga8757
      @agffga8757 4 года назад

      @@LardGreystoke research isn't done on RUclips but there are lectures of advanced topics on RUclips, such as perturbation theory in Cosmology, or quantum field theory in curved spacetimes, why not stellar evolution?

  • @dileepsohal162
    @dileepsohal162 6 лет назад

    Also, cam contamination cause irradiation over a longer period of time ?

  • @dileepsohal162
    @dileepsohal162 6 лет назад

    Thank you for this One question if you don’t mind If irradiation occurs, does that mean contamination can’t occur at the same time?

  • @blitzvinnigFPV
    @blitzvinnigFPV 6 лет назад

    Thank you so much, can't tell you enough how much this has helped me. You deserve more subscribers!

    • @prxcense5082
      @prxcense5082 3 года назад

      simp

    • @rxsselas
      @rxsselas 3 года назад

      @@prxcense5082 HUH? how he a simp for saying it helped him or her. I gotta watch this for school and it helped me. am I a simp now? no!

  • @professoreggplant9985
    @professoreggplant9985 6 лет назад

    Life saver!